fix exec load for new compilers
This commit is contained in:
parent
cdd493c0e4
commit
2298934ed7
@ -161,20 +161,21 @@ static u32 exec_load(u32 fd,const Elf32_Ehdr* Echo_Ehdr,const Elf32_Phdr Echo_Ph
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//我们还不能确定elf中一共能有几个program,但就目前我们查看过的elf文件中,只出现过两中program,一种.text(R-E)和一种.data(RW-)
|
||||
// (This is bullshit)我们还不能确定elf中一共能有几个program,但就目前我们查看过的elf文件中,只出现过两中program,一种.text(R-E)和一种.data(RW-)
|
||||
// 上面一句话导致了去年出现了诡异的错误,暂时只能说简单修复了一下,但是这个系统的权限就很混乱
|
||||
for( ph_num=0; ph_num<Echo_Ehdr->e_phnum ; ph_num++ )
|
||||
{
|
||||
if( 0==Echo_Phdr[ph_num].p_memsz )
|
||||
{//最后一个program
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if( Echo_Phdr[ph_num].p_flags == 0x5 || Echo_Phdr[ph_num].p_flags == 0x4) //101,只读
|
||||
if (Echo_Phdr[ph_num].p_flags & 0x1) // xx1,__E, executable seg must be code seg
|
||||
{//.text
|
||||
exec_elfcpy(fd,Echo_Phdr[ph_num],PG_P | PG_USU | PG_RWR);//进程代码段
|
||||
p_proc_current->task.memmap.text_lin_base = Echo_Phdr[ph_num].p_vaddr;
|
||||
p_proc_current->task.memmap.text_lin_limit = Echo_Phdr[ph_num].p_vaddr + Echo_Phdr[ph_num].p_memsz;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if(Echo_Phdr[ph_num].p_flags == 0x6)//110,读写
|
||||
else if (Echo_Phdr[ph_num].p_flags & 0x4) // 1xx,R__, treat all readable but not executable segs as data seg, though some may be RW and some RO
|
||||
{//.data
|
||||
exec_elfcpy(fd,Echo_Phdr[ph_num],PG_P | PG_USU | PG_RWW);//进程数据段
|
||||
p_proc_current->task.memmap.data_lin_base = Echo_Phdr[ph_num].p_vaddr;
|
||||
@ -199,7 +200,7 @@ static int exec_pcb_init(char* path)
|
||||
char* p_regs; //point to registers in the new kernel stack, added by xw, 17/12/11
|
||||
|
||||
//名称 状态 特权级 寄存器
|
||||
strcpy(p_proc_current->task.p_name, path); //名称
|
||||
strncpy(p_proc_current->task.p_name, path, sizeof(p_proc_current->task.p_name) - 1); // 名称
|
||||
p_proc_current->task.stat = READY; //状态
|
||||
p_proc_current->task.ldts[0].attr1 = DA_C | PRIVILEGE_USER << 5;//特权级修改为用户级
|
||||
p_proc_current->task.ldts[1].attr1 = DA_DRW | PRIVILEGE_USER << 5;//特权级修改为用户级
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user