LogSeq/pages/hls__ostep_1680491762166_0.md
ridethepig e698da3c30 ...
2023-04-10 21:11:08 +08:00

1344 lines
61 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

file-path:: ../assets/ostep_1680491762166_0.pdf
- ![OSTEP-book](../assets/ostep_1680491762166_0.pdf)
- virtualization, concurrency, and persistence
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 1
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642a452b-2dc9-4566-b8a8-95f0caa7b8e3
- didactic 道德说教的;教诲的;
hl-page:: 2
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642a7c33-ca04-447a-a357-88236d0b9360
hl-color:: green
- Cramming 填塞;填鸭式用功;考试前临时硬记
hl-page:: 3
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642a80b7-43a1-40ba-ad01-815cb171572f
hl-color:: green
- fond 喜爱(尤指认识已久的人);喜爱(尤指长期喜爱的事物)
hl-page:: 4
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642a80ef-5f31-422a-8227-3842faa4eb8d
hl-color:: green
- the operating system as a virtual machine, standard library and resource manager
hl-page:: 25
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642bb88b-f481-4af6-afb6-7375d37654ce
hl-color:: yellow
- illusion 错觉,幻象
hl-page:: 27
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642bb978-1efe-418e-8894-8493bfd4f6bb
hl-color:: green
- virtualizing the CPU: run many programs at the same time
hl-page:: 27
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642bb9c2-efb8-4960-a7bd-36afe1cc0b1d
hl-color:: yellow
- virtualizing memory: each process accesses its own private virtual address space
hl-page:: 29
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642bbaae-582b-4b1c-bc60-e709931085e7
hl-color:: yellow
- intricate 错综复杂的
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 33
hl-color:: green
id:: 642bbca9-67e2-45d3-a131-968df46c0cef
- heyday 全盛时期
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 39
hl-color:: green
id:: 642bc0e8-ee33-46a6-bf83-407cc1e64737
- incredulous 不肯相信的;不能相信的;表示怀疑的
hl-page:: 45
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642bc1b3-459e-4e76-b36c-406daba96726
hl-color:: green
- The definition of a process, informally, is quite simple: it is a running program
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 47
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642bc39c-f56a-488f-a751-1532e413d474
- To implement virtualization of the CPU, low-level machinery and some high-level intelligence.
hl-page:: 47
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642bc417-a3af-4132-b4b9-9fec9749fc9b
hl-color:: yellow
- mechanisms are low-level methods or protocols that implement a needed piece of functionality
hl-page:: 47
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642bc41d-8b68-46d9-908e-ab14b53a859b
hl-color:: yellow
- Policies are algorithms for making some kind of decision within the OS
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 48
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642bc579-a1cc-4b67-a8c5-5a33f274c634
- inventory 库存;财产清单;
hl-page:: 48
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642bc8a9-1a7d-4236-86ce-65b0498e9e01
hl-color:: green
- three states of a process: Running Ready Blocked
hl-page:: 51
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642bd104-6b57-44f2-9f10-e5107a926079
hl-color:: yellow
- nitty-gritty 本质;事实真相;实质问题
hl-page:: 55
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642c279e-0187-4175-abfb-5fcf4e534ae8
hl-color:: green
- KEY PROCESS TERMS
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 56
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642c27e3-d7d6-41d8-9832-73674615a246
- Interlude: Process API
hl-page:: 60
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cc7d2-cd33-4dd6-879f-72f1070ed96d
hl-color:: yellow
Syscall-fork, wait, exec
- Get it right. Neither abstraction nor simplicity is a substitute for getting it right
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 65
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642cc975-cf26-431c-8c38-617da01d89ee
- the separation of fork() and exec() is essential in shell, because it lets the shell <u>run code after the call to fork() but before the call to exec()</u>; this code can alter the environment of the about-to-be-run program
hl-page:: 65
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ccc92-baa5-4b54-8525-9a664698c669
hl-color:: yellow
- imperative 必要的,命令的;必要的事
hl-page:: 67
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ccf62-0b5a-41db-899e-3e99a69c2eac
hl-color:: green
- control processes through signal subsystem
hl-page:: 67
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cd11a-eea5-48f8-b4d1-b225f37ccdb4
hl-color:: yellow
- Limited Direct Execution: Direct execution is to simply run the program directly on the CPU.
hl-page:: 74
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cd1eb-c058-484a-ac25-782e37082bc6
hl-color:: yellow
- aspiring 有追求的,有抱负的
hl-page:: 75
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cd2f2-c565-4309-951a-1f809da9beff
hl-color:: green
- user mode and kernel mode
hl-page:: 76
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cd3e3-3fa6-43a6-a37a-cae62c634654
hl-color:: yellow
- In user mode, code is restricted in what it can do, otherwise the processor will raise an exception
- User code perform system call to do privileged operation.
- To execute a system call, use `trap` and `return-from-trap` instruction: jump to/from kernel and change the privilege level.
- Limited Direct Execution Protocol-interesting figure illustrating how system call is done
hl-page:: 78
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cd6be-083b-4ecd-b220-aafef97a8b65
hl-color:: yellow
- wary 谨慎的;考虑周到的
hl-page:: 79
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cd6e9-21fc-49c7-b0bb-0c9ba3b7a524
hl-color:: green
- Switching Between Processes: how OS regain control of the CPU
hl-page:: 80
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cd90e-ab6b-4d4d-8312-cd8c69efdac8
hl-color:: yellow
- Cooperative Approach: wait for a system call. 1. The processes are expected to give up the CPU periodically through system call `yield`(which does nothing except to transfer control to the OS). 2. The process does something that causes a trap
- Non-Cooperative Approach: timer interrupt.
- Context switch: save a few register values for the currently-executing process.
Two types of register saves/restores: TI, hardware save state to kernel stack; context switch, OS save kernel registers and restore everything to return from trap
- malfeasance 渎职;不正当行为
hl-page:: 81
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cdc2e-329c-423e-a65a-0a53fb6eaa76
hl-color:: green
- scoff 嘲笑;愚弄;笑柄
hl-page:: 83
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ce319-8087-4252-b51d-42f749f7c283
hl-color:: green
- enact 制定(法律);通过(法案)
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 83
hl-color:: green
id:: 642ce357-9914-417b-8036-35ae44ac7283
- whet 引起,刺激(食欲、欲望、兴趣等)
hl-page:: 84
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cef47-0c2f-482f-8b61-9a715e5438e5
hl-color:: green
- analogous 相似的,可比拟的
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 86
hl-color:: green
id:: 642cf0c1-59a2-410e-8f45-517f66ef47f9
- workload assumptions: Each job, runs for the same amount of time, arrives at the same time, runs to completion, uses only CPU, and run-time is known
hl-page:: 90
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cf292-4464-4c8f-8639-3a194484d4c0
hl-color:: yellow
- Quite unrealistic, but modern preemptive scheduling somewhat mimics part of these assumptions
- scheduling metric: turnaround time, aka `completion - arrival`
hl-page:: 91
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cf48d-b312-4af1-a2ff-d55cf9f32e48
hl-color:: yellow
- conundrum 谜,猜不透的难题,难答的问题
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 91
hl-color:: green
id:: 642cf4c4-d246-48f2-a6ef-f14c77684ad9
- First In, First Out (FIFO/FCFS) algorithm
hl-page:: 91
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cf4f9-4afd-4240-ac76-5522285fa1eb
hl-color:: yellow
- Bad average turnaround when long job runs first(The jobs run for **different amount of time**)
- Convoy effect: a number of relatively-short potential consumers of a resource get queued behind a heavyweight resource consumer
- Shortest Job First(SJF)
hl-page:: 93
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642cf705-4a47-4daa-a542-43c4ae6f239e
hl-color:: yellow
- assuming that jobs all arriving at the same time, it could be proven that SJF is indeed an optimal scheduling algorithm
- Downgrade to the same problem of Convey Effect when jobs **don't arrive at the same time**. For example, short jobs arrive shortly after the long job.
- Shortest Time-to-Completion First (STCF)
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 94
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642cfce4-67f5-4315-bf81-445922b8ae54
- Basically, it is SJF(by our definition is a non-preemptive scheduler) with **preemption**. When a new job enters the system, STCF schedules to the job with the least time left among all present jobs(including the new guy).
- Metric: Response Time. Defined as `resp = firstrun - arrival`. Compare to ((642cf48d-b312-4af1-a2ff-d55cf9f32e48))
hl-page:: 95
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642e41ac-3b8f-4fe3-a9ef-e2adeeadfe9d
hl-color:: yellow
- For this metric, STCF is not that good.
- Round-Robin (RR)
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 96
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642e435d-7116-4d2c-9ec3-889558ba2dca
- Not run jobs to completion But run a job for a time slice and then Switch to the next job in the run queue. Repeat until the jobs are done
- Good for Response Time, bad for Turnaround Time.
- Length of time slice is critical, in theory the shorter the better performance under response time metric. However, cost of context switching will dominate overall performance. The cost of context switching comes not only from save/restore registers, but also from caches or something alike.
- amortization 分期偿还;折旧;(均摊)
hl-page:: 97
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642e4473-4162-4320-91af-fba22e79be25
hl-color:: green
- pessimal 最差的;最坏的
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 97
hl-color:: green
id:: 642e4a5d-37c1-4484-b2ac-913e40d8a2dc
- Incorporating I/O: Overlap. Basic idea is to treat each CPU burst(rather than the whole job) as a job, so that the job is divided into parts. This enables the scheduler to choose another job to run when the job is doing IO
hl-page:: 98
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642e4ed2-7674-4a5f-bb65-67541b97db95
hl-color:: yellow
- Multi-level Feedback Queue (MLFQ)
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 103
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642e5117-90c3-41db-9f15-45f3ba9edf91
- Workload: a mix of interactive jobs that are short-running, and some longer-running “CPU-bound” jobs
- Basic rules: each job assigned to a priority level and MLFQ decides which job to run by priority. In this scheme, a job with higher priority runs first, and jobs with the same priority RR. ((642ecc9e-b28b-4951-aaf6-1191e867b34f))
- Change priority: set priority based on its observed behavior, for example, keep high priority for interactive jobs which frequently relinquish CPU.
collapsed:: true
- one of the major goals of the algorithm: It doesnt know whether a job will be short or job, it first assumes it might be short, thus giving high priority. If it actually is short, it will run quickly and complete; if it is not, it will slowly move down the queues, and thus soon prove itself to be a long-running more batch-like process.
hl-page:: 107
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ece05-2fa8-4a24-88e2-f2550cfdd2ed
hl-color:: yellow
- Approximates SJF
- Basic rules for MLFQ:
hl-page:: 104
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ecc9e-b28b-4951-aaf6-1191e867b34f
hl-color:: yellow
collapsed:: true
- Rule 1: If Priority(A) > Priority(B), A runs (B doesnt).
- Rule 2: If Priority(A) = Priority(B), A & B run in RR.
- Problematic priority adjustment algorithm
hl-page:: 105
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ecd09-c81b-4127-8bfa-e1fbb78ba583
hl-color:: yellow
collapsed:: true
- Rule 3: When a job enters the system, it is placed at the highest priority (the topmost queue).
- Rule 4a: If a job uses up an entire time slice while running, its priority is reduced.
id:: 642ecd25-c824-4dcd-9a6a-43a717dd5b1e
Rule 4b: If a job gives up the CPU before the time slice is up, it stays at the same priority level.
- Problem 1: starvation.
id:: 642ecd3f-c076-42f1-ba24-7f363eba9e14
If there are too many interactive jobs *occupying the CPU in combination*, then the long jobs will never get to run
- Problem 2: game the scheduler.
For example, a CPU-bound job intentionally issue a trivial IO request just before its time slice is over, so that it will not be moved to lower queue although it should be.
- Problem 3: program behavior change.
id:: 642ed383-c27c-401c-b77f-66e7ec60ba5e
- The Priority Boost
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 109
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642ed47c-9ba8-4451-b6b3-6ca6ee1dbdda
collapsed:: true
- Rule 5: After some time period `S`, move all the jobs in the system to the topmost queue.
- This solves the problem of ((642ecd3f-c076-42f1-ba24-7f363eba9e14)) and ((642ed383-c27c-401c-b77f-66e7ec60ba5e)). Since the priorities will get recalculated periodically, the scheduler re-learns the jobs' traits which may have changed.
- However, how to choose such `S` is a problem.
- voo-doo constants
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 109
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642ed799-d933-441a-a043-06e47877c0d9
- Better Accounting
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 110
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642ed5f6-2a74-4a24-9f69-a472cf644fc9
collapsed:: true
- Rule 4: Once a job uses up its time allotment at a given level (regardless of how many times it has given up the CPU), its priority is reduced.
- This substitutes ((642ecd25-c824-4dcd-9a6a-43a717dd5b1e))
- parameterized scheduler
hl-page:: 110
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ed6a2-c04b-4f03-a86f-1d70933c0d42
hl-color:: yellow
- relinquish 交出,让给;放弃
hl-page:: 105
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ec9be-dd64-4a66-ab7a-3f0ee376e055
hl-color:: green
- culprit 犯人,罪犯;被控犯罪的人
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 110
hl-color:: green
id:: 642ed5fe-3314-4020-a4fc-b1b75ea987b9
- Proportional-share(fair-share) scheduler
hl-page:: 115
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642eda22-bd34-42e4-b7e4-1107636d1fbc
hl-color:: yellow
- Instead of optimizing for turnaround or response time, the scheduler tries to guarantee that <u>each job obtain a certain percentage of CPU time</u>.
- tickets: represent the share of a resource that a process should receive
hl-page:: 115
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642edaa2-78d2-4fde-8b14-584b7d39fa24
hl-color:: yellow
- ticket currency: kind of user interface. Users allocate tickets freely to their own processes, and the system converts user tickets to global tickets according to some kind of exchange rate, in order to achieve fairness between users.
hl-page:: 117
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642edc09-1329-4eca-95ad-7f62b48875e2
hl-color:: yellow
- ticket transfer: kind of cooperation between processes. A process temporarily hands off its tickets to another process.
hl-page:: 117
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642edc0f-464d-4616-9313-92b640cecec5
hl-color:: yellow
- ticket inflation: another kind of cooperation. A process can temporarily raise or lower the number of tickets it owns, to indicate that it needs CPU.
hl-page:: 117
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642edc14-74d6-4758-a21f-d615d2ee51c9
hl-color:: yellow
- Lottery scheduling
hl-page:: 115
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642edb1d-7740-4459-bb42-0c6a84156475
hl-color:: yellow
- Scheduler **randomly** pick a winning ticket(i.e. number the tickets 1-N, and do a range random), the job which holdes this ticket runs. The more tickets a job holds, the higher chance it is chosen to run. Thus the CPU is shared by proportion, probabilistically.
- Lottery Fairness Study: When the job length is not very long, unfairness can be quite severe. Only as the jobs run for a significant number of time slices does the lottery scheduler approach the desired outcome.
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 119
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642eded0-39d0-40aa-8b28-c273d39f90c2
- Stride scheduling: a **deterministic** fair-share scheduler.
hl-page:: 120
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642edf4f-7c7f-477f-acae-0969da13731e
hl-color:: yellow
- Each job has a *stride*, which is inverse in proportion to the tickets it has (conceptually like reciprocal).
Every time a process runs, increase its counter(called its *pass* value) by 1 stride.
The scheduler picks the process with lowest pass value to run
- Why still lottery scheduling? No global states! Thus much easier to implement.
- Problem: How to determine how many tickets to assign to your processes with different purposes and traits? MLFQ does this automatically, but here nobody does this.
- Completely Fair Scheduler (CFS)
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 121
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642ee1b9-281d-4589-ab90-e776507dd04f
- Goal: to fairly divide a CPU evenly among all competing processes.
hl-page:: 122
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ee242-d382-4685-86b4-b3169fcc4fcf
hl-color:: yellow
- virtual runtime: As each process runs, it accumulates `vruntime`. And the scheduler picks the lowest one to run.
hl-page:: 122
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ee25b-1f3a-4b7c-a721-fa60f5fa5d2f
hl-color:: yellow
- For blocked processes: need to alter `vruntime` of a job when it wakes up. Otherwise, its `vruntime` would be too small thus breaking fairness. CFS chooses the minimum `vruntime` in the running process table.
hl-page:: 125
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ee7e4-20d2-44d5-8407-288a8a2e1769
hl-color:: yellow
- Parameters
- `sched_latency`: when running, scheduler divides this value by the number of running processes `n`. The result is used as the time slice for each process. This simple approach is adaptive to dynamic change of running processes.
hl-page:: 122
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ee303-c289-4e55-a0c5-bc4f534fa882
hl-color:: yellow
- `min_granularity`: minimum of time slice, to avoid reducing performance too much
hl-page:: 122
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ee3d6-827b-4d80-b6c3-9cb8253a16d6
hl-color:: yellow
- Weighting (Niceness): every process is assigned to a `nice` value ranging from -20 to 19. The smaller nice value, the higher priority. A nice value is mapped to some `weight` through a carefully built table.
hl-page:: 123
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ee44f-5fca-4d7d-b688-ff4ac22be23a
hl-color:: yellow
- Given the weight, the time slice can be calculated, and the calculation for `vruntime` needs adaptation to guarantee the time slice.
$$ time\_slice_k = \frac{weight_k}{\sum weight_i}\cdot sched\_latency \\ vruntime_i = vruntime_i + \frac{weight_0}{weight_i} \cdot runtime_i$$
-
- hallmark 特征;特点:
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 126
hl-color:: green
id:: 642ee5dd-9183-4122-9dee-06ff7fb9be46
- panacea 万能药
hl-page:: 126
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642ee8c2-89fe-4e7b-bf6d-bb0e379f8fe2
hl-color:: green
- remedy 补救方法
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 129
hl-color:: green
id:: 642eeb3a-8803-4c73-84a7-cc48c903f10f
- proliferation 涌现;增殖
hl-page:: 129
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642eeb44-cf62-4cf6-81cb-f1f6423cb66d
hl-color:: green
- Problems with multiple processors
- cache coherence: basically, hardware handles this
hl-page:: 132
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642eecc1-d07d-4e48-bcd5-b84db831b241
hl-color:: yellow
- Synchronization: though locks ensure correctness, performance is harmed
hl-page:: 132
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642f878b-44c2-4485-ae98-448032b588da
hl-color:: yellow
- Cache Affinity: cache may still keep some of the process's state, so this may be faster if the process runs on the same CPU next time, in that there is no need to load state from memory.
hl-page:: 133
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642f87d0-2e9a-405c-8fa6-689dc492ef52
hl-color:: yellow
- Single-Queue Multiprocessor Scheduling(SQMS)
hl-page:: 134
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642f88e3-3f8b-472b-8947-09531409a23b
hl-color:: yellow
- Simply use the same policy as we do in the single processor condition, and pick maybe more than one best jobs to run.
- Problem 1: lack of scalability. Since it is a single global queue, there will be a lot of contention on the same lock, thus greatly reducing the performance.
- Problem 2: cache affinity. If the scheduler simply feed processes to CPU by order, the jobs will bounce around from CPU to CPU. Complex affinity mechanism is needed to try to make it more likely that process will continue to run on the same CPU.
- Multi-Queue Multiprocessor Scheduling (MQMS).
hl-page:: 135
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642f90ef-6bf0-42be-8056-188682da8901
hl-color:: yellow
- Consists of multiple independent queues following some particular policy. Avoid problems of sharing and synchronization.
- More scalable: when number of CPUs grows, add more queues.
- Better cache affinity: jobs in the same queue stay in the same CPU
- Problem: load imbalance. The jobs in the queue with fewer jobs get more CPU share than those in the queue with more jobs. Or even worse, some CPUs are IDLE. (一核有难,七核围观)
hl-page:: 136
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642f934e-0f7b-43de-97a1-fc530b229098
hl-color:: yellow
- Migration: the obvious solution to load imbalance, is to migrate some jobs from one CPU to another. Sometimes, we need to keep switching jobs, in such case that Q1 has 1 job and Q2 has 2 jobs. You may want to keep moving the third job from one CPU to another, to balance load.
hl-page:: 137
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642f9564-38b9-4f22-a0af-f4c4f6c8fe76
hl-color:: yellow
- Work stealing: source queue(low on jobs) occasionally peek at other queues to see whether it is a good idea to move some jobs to help balance load.
- sinister 危险的, 不吉祥的
hl-page:: 136
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642f914d-502e-4f9d-8878-cf331e7f3fc3
hl-color:: green
- insidious 隐伏的,潜在的,阴险的
hl-page:: 137
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642f9458-c07c-4ef3-a1ec-a14e76ea4b2b
hl-color:: green
- dissertation 专题论文, 学位论文
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 138
hl-color:: green
id:: 642f96cb-066e-4ab9-975c-a746e3143062
- daunting 使人畏缩的;使人气馁的;
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 138
hl-color:: green
id:: 642f97ac-a4ab-4baf-b039-678c466ea588
- undertake 承担;从事;负责
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 138
hl-color:: green
id:: 642f97b5-d203-4998-84f0-21d66f8424b7
- Linux Multiprocessor Schedulers: 3 different schedulers. CFS and O(1) are MQMS, while BFS is SQMS based on EEVDF.
hl-page:: 138
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642f981d-af29-4cc1-a9da-b445cb964674
hl-color:: yellow
- super-linear speedup: Sometimes a speedup of more than A when using A processors is observed in parallel computing. One possible reason for this is that, these CPUs offers larger cache size all together. If properly designed, memory access could even be eliminated, thus greatly improving performance.
hl-page:: 141
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642faf44-5876-46b3-acb4-b786f390716f
hl-color:: yellow
- paranoid 多疑的;偏执狂;妄想症患者
hl-page:: 142
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fb2f2-b9a4-48f4-b847-2b30d632db32
hl-color:: green
- rage 暴怒;狂怒;迅速蔓延;快速扩散:
hl-page:: 143
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fb3d2-e51f-4b9b-8a79-dea9d8e6a7b0
hl-color:: green
- inundate 泛滥;淹没;浸水;
hl-page:: 144
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fb4c0-5c56-44e9-aac6-396212698309
hl-color:: green
- errant 周游的;不定的;错误的;偏离正路的
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 145
hl-color:: green
id:: 642fb51d-f82c-40b4-82ad-878ee13a2264
- darned
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 146
hl-color:: green
id:: 642fb54e-23c4-4667-955d-ad09fbbf6268
- pesky 烦人的;让人讨厌的
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 148
hl-color:: green
id:: 642fb9df-d4c2-4b75-9341-e9ea53d42dcc
- Address space: process's view of memory, the abstraction that the OS provides to the running program. When OS does this, we say it is **virtualizing memory**.
hl-page:: 148
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fbad1-cda0-4ef4-97f7-38c3519042f4
hl-color:: yellow
- Goal: transparency, efficiency and protection
- tandem
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 150
hl-color:: green
id:: 642fbb6e-9a9a-4ff6-92ea-b36903da1b88
- stipulate
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 150
hl-color:: green
id:: 642fbc3d-d70b-4adb-bb0b-6b7038480589
- scribble
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 159
hl-color:: green
id:: 642fbfcb-7327-44b8-9b25-308728264a81
- Memory API: this interlude chapter talks about memory allocation interfaces like `malloc` and `free`. Quite trivial for proficient C programmers.
hl-page:: 155
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fc139-afc3-4ba4-ad01-4cc33d9e535c
hl-color:: yellow
- hardware-based address translation
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 167
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642fd36e-c0a7-4ead-a3a8-f085d6576229
- Assumptions
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 167
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642fc48b-e5bf-4043-b042-218445c2b714
- Address space mapped to contiguous physical memory
id:: 6430040b-bfaa-4148-a49a-1a22350e0c33
- Address space can be totally held in physical memory(no too big)
- Each address space is the same size.
- Dynamic (Hardware-based) Relocation
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 170
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642fc65f-1147-459c-8906-5ffca38b1e66
- Software-based(static) relocation: program loader rewrites the to-be-loaded program's addresses according to its target offset in physical memory. The most important problem with this approach is that, protection can hardly be enforced.
hl-page:: 171
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fc677-cbd4-47fd-bd90-3ed0cd56cc5b
hl-color:: yellow
- base-and-bounds: 2 registers for *each* CPU, used for determining the physical location of the address space.
- Before running, program is compiled as if it is loaded at address 0x00000000.
On startup, OS decide where to put the program and set `base` register.
When running, CPU translates process's memory reference(virtual address -> physical address) and issue request to RAM using physical address. `physcal address = virtual address + base`
- `bounds` register is there to help with protection, hardware checks whether the translated address exceeds the bound
- Dynamic Relocation: Hardware Requirements
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 174
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642fd1ed-22a9-4443-b02f-bc35fe42e50b
- Dynamic Relocation: Operating System Responsibilities. In addition to the LDE introduced in CPU virtualization, a little more work needs to be done, like base/bounds register save/restore, memory allocation and deallocation.
hl-page:: 175
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fd1f4-d573-4dbc-9e48-02adacc69e5e
hl-color:: yellow
- The stuff is not difficult to figure out on your own, so, why bother keeping notes on it?
- Problem: Internal fragmentation. Since the address space has fixed size in Dynamic Relocation, the used part of memory between stack and heap is wasted.
hl-page:: 178
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fd2f3-e05f-453c-8286-15e7807e8e97
hl-color:: yellow
- Programs may want larger address space(though not fully used)
- Memory Management Unit (MMU): the part of the processor that helps with address translation.
hl-page:: 172
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fced7-c809-4d1e-bddb-da6474e851b8
hl-color:: yellow
- havoc 浩劫;灾害;祸患
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 173
hl-color:: green
id:: 642fcf85-6cfb-4eb9-aef2-ddcef7027b70
- wreak 造成(巨大的破坏或伤害);施行(报复)
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 173
hl-color:: green
id:: 642fcf90-3133-4002-b986-4fd8157ab707
- ghastly 可怕的;惨白的;惊人的;极坏的
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 174
hl-color:: green
id:: 642fcfa9-c026-4885-9f50-029ca80ce148
- juncture 接缝;连接;接合;特定时刻,关头;
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 174
hl-color:: green
id:: 642fcff1-ae71-4756-9847-5ab85c41be06
- oblivious 未察觉;不注意;忘记
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 175
hl-color:: green
id:: 642fd071-db9c-4f0e-886f-b6ba3e5e4f7d
- Segmentation: Generalized Base/Bounds
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 181
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 642fd5c3-30f9-4770-8ec5-09555d21c4ab
- Divide the address space into contiguous segments, and **the address space as a whole is no more contiguous in physical memory**. ((6430040b-bfaa-4148-a49a-1a22350e0c33))
- A base and bounds pair per logical segment of the address space. Place each one of those segments in different parts of physical memory, and thus avoid filling physical memory with unused virtual address space. Conforming to this, MMU should add some registers.
- Selecting segment: which segment does a virtual address refer to?
- Explicit method: use the top few bits of the virtual address as segment selector, and the rest as in-segment offset.
- Problem 1: bit wasted, for example, we have only 3 segments, but we have to use 2-bits which provides 4.
- Problem2: limits the use of the virtual address space. Because the top bits is taken away to represent segments, the maximum of a segment is reduced.
- implicit approach, the hardware determines the segment by noticing how the address was formed. For example, PC -> code segment, SP -> stack segment
hl-page:: 185
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fda54-4040-4d9b-ab00-13523aeb54c4
hl-color:: yellow
- Stack segment support: stack grows backwards. First, add a field to hardware to indicate a segment grows positive or not. When proceeding a negative growing segment, the physical address is calculated as `PA = VA[offset] - MAX_SEG_SIZE + base`, signed operation
hl-page:: 186
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fdca4-df4b-4515-8e96-ef4b05a7bb62
hl-color:: yellow
- A real world example for this is the E(Expand-Down) bit in x86's segment descriptor.
- The reason why design such a weird mechanism is explained here: [osdev-expand_down](https://wiki.osdev.org/Expand_Down#Expand_Down). In short, programs may require the a segment to grow its size when the initially allocated segment is too small.
- Support for Sharing: protection bits.
hl-page:: 187
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 642fe0dc-7d4b-41af-a136-69164ee77ab4
hl-color:: yellow
- Attach several protection bits to Segment Register. For example, by setting code segment to read-only, you can safely share the segment across processes, thus saving the memory to hold a copy of code when a program creates many processes.
- Problem 1: variable-sized segments cause ((64302439-30a1-4724-ab5f-0d90ab8530e2))
id:: 6430040b-2a6e-4342-8db8-bc92893d0a3f
- Problem 2: not flexible enough. What if we want a large enough but sparsely-allocated heap(the heap segment could be very large but wastefully used)?
- external fragmentation
hl-page:: 193
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64302439-30a1-4724-ab5f-0d90ab8530e2
hl-color:: yellow
- the free space gets chopped into little pieces of different size(fragmented); subsequent requests may fail because there is no single contiguous space that can satisfy the request, even though the total amount of free space suffices.
- Assumptions on free space management
hl-page:: 194
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430258a-4890-4fea-97c3-2d6bef20b251
hl-color:: yellow
- Assume a pair of interface `void* malloc(size_t size)` and `void free(void* ptr)`, and a generic data structure `free list`(not necessarily be a list)
- Ignore internal fragmentation
- No reallocation, no compaction
- Assume the allocator manages a contiguous and size-fixed region of bytes
- coalesce 联合;合并
hl-page:: 195
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64302a62-c183-4dbf-94de-1861deb192f4
hl-color:: green
- intact 完整的;原封不动的;未受损伤的
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 196
hl-color:: green
id:: 64302b20-f76e-4516-868f-0ecab376328f
- corollary 必然的结果(或结论)
hl-page:: 196
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64302b32-b01b-4cb2-b027-5ad59bd7ec11
hl-color:: green
- Low-level mechanisms(some discussion on practical stuff)
- A free list contains a set of elements that describe the free space still remaining in the heap. For example, `{addr, len}`
hl-page:: 195
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64302ac2-a341-467e-9469-baca1e8aa7f2
hl-color:: yellow
- Splitting and Coalescing
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 195
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 64302da4-d1d5-41df-8ec8-883712d948d5
- split: if the request is smaller than a free block, then the allocator splits the block, take requested part and put the rest part back to free list
- coalesce: when returning a free chunk, the allocator looks for its nearby chunks in the free list and merge them into larger free chunk
- Tracking The Size Of Allocated Regions
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 197
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 64302eab-54b3-4e8c-a105-cc3e8747c0f3
- Store some extra info in a header, which generally contains a size field and some other checking or speedup fields. Commonly, the header is placed just before the handed-out chunk of memory.
- When allocating, we look for a free block that fits `N+sizeof(header)` instead of merely `N`. In other words, the header is allocated along with the requested chunk of memory, though the pointer to return doesn't include header. See ((64303176-25c9-4d28-bd6e-b5b00bf74e3a)). The header's location could be calculated through pointer arithmetic `ptr - sizeof(header)`.
- Figure 17.2: Specific Contents Of The Header
hl-page:: 197
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303176-25c9-4d28-bd6e-b5b00bf74e3a
hl-color:: yellow
- Embedding A Free List
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 198
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 643032f8-4103-4d7c-b471-fae4364ce7b5
- The free list's nodes resides in the chunk of memory that it is going to manage, because we cannot use stuff like `malloc` now.
- The implementation described in the textbook, can be concluded as:
Node structure `{size, *next}`
Each node resides at the start of a contiguous free chunk of memory
When allocated, the node moves to the start of the remaining free memory
- Basic Strategies: quite boring policies
hl-page:: 203
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 643034f6-efa7-4f59-80a9-3561c52a5218
hl-color:: yellow
- Best Fit: pick the smallest chunk of memory that is as big or bigger than the requested size
hl-page:: 203
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430350b-81b6-44db-a10d-fb0b392e957c
hl-color:: yellow
- Try to reduce wasted space, though performance is compromised and many small free fragments are generated
- Worst Fit: pick the largest chunk of memory that is as big or bigger than the requested size
hl-page:: 203
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430350e-5d5f-4e5a-9342-7b57874ffda8
hl-color:: yellow
- Try to leave big chunks free and void small fragments, though costly and may not work as expected(in contrast leading to excess fragmentation)
- First Fit: select the first block that is big enough
hl-page:: 204
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303512-4b59-4c95-b86d-62a2e1349490
hl-color:: yellow
- No exhaustive search, thus fast.
- Problem: small pieces tend to accumulate at the beginning of the free list(first fit tends to take memory there), performance become worse. One alleviation approach is to use <u>address-based ordering</u>, which makes coalescing easier by keeping the list ordered by the address of free chunks.
- Next Fit: modified version of first fit. Try not to always take memory from the beginning.
hl-page:: 204
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303515-c336-4934-987d-4ea4a29a7dfd
hl-color:: yellow
- Envision 想像,展望
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 204
hl-color:: green
id:: 6430382d-9e37-412f-b983-e2a7f624954a
- splinter 尖片, 碎片;刺
hl-page:: 204
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303831-b777-42c4-a349-d6e95ac91b25
hl-color:: green
- **Segregated Lists**
hl-page:: 205
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303b17-81c8-4d92-ab80-1e48c3598403
hl-color:: yellow
- Basic Idea: If a particular application has one (or a few) popular-sized request, keep a separate list just to manage objects of that size; all other requests are forwarded to a more general memory allocator.
hl-page:: 205
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303b24-47e4-4016-8111-519c599e6cca
hl-color:: yellow
- Advantage: reduced fragmentation, faster service IF requests are of the RIGHT size
Problem: how to figure out that?
- Real world example: `slab`.
- At kernel bootstrap, allocate a number of <u>object caches</u> for kernel objects that are likely to be requested frequently
hl-page:: 205
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303d7c-6ac2-462c-98c9-1b61ea58a396
hl-color:: yellow
- When a given cache is running low on free space, it requests some slabs of memory from a more general memory allocator
hl-page:: 205
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303d8e-54a3-4b7f-a879-7c2533ad8b02
hl-color:: yellow
- When the reference counts of the objects within a given slab all go to 0, the general allocator can reclaim them from the specialized allocator
hl-page:: 205
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303da3-9def-447a-9cc8-08942db17f38
hl-color:: yellow
- Free objects on the segregated lists are set in a **pre-initialized state**, in that initialization and destruction of data structures is costly
hl-page:: 206
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303db7-987f-47ed-84de-c17e421159aa
hl-color:: yellow
- **Binary Buddy Allocator**: simplify coalescing
hl-page:: 206
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303dc5-8073-4659-9f39-ec6167683a7d
hl-color:: yellow
- Allocation: Recursively divide free space by 2 until a block which is MERELY big enough to accommodate the request (and a further split would be too small), is found.
hl-page:: 206
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64303f3a-2b0f-4106-8ab1-48e4839fe971
hl-color:: yellow
- Deallocation: When a block is returned, check whether its buddy is free. If so, coalesce with its buddy. Recursively coalesce up the tree, and stop when a buddy is in use.
hl-page:: 206
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64304015-d9ff-408b-bf88-cf37a33e832d
hl-color:: yellow
- Good quality: the address of each buddy pair only differs by a single bit, no matter the base address.
hl-page:: 207
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 643040e1-7784-424c-9096-d3e22fddbf9e
hl-color:: yellow
- Page: <u>fixed-sized memory</u> unit in address space
hl-page:: 211
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 643044ff-fd8a-45fe-b564-f93683425ab3
hl-color:: yellow
Page frame: physical memory as an array of fixed-sized slots
- Avoid external fragmentation by dividing fixed-sized units instead of variable-sized segments
- page table: store address translations for each of the virtual pages of the address space
hl-page:: 213
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430bfab-9ff7-44cb-ad64-c422796cad71
hl-color:: yellow
- per-process data structure
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 213
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 6430c091-bc57-4930-bac1-9e1762b7c3e1
- Virtual address splits into two components: the virtual page number (VPN), and the offset
hl-page:: 213
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430c0a5-6e88-455c-8a62-ab6e60fca98f
hl-color:: yellow
- physical frame number (PFN)
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 214
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 6430c173-13a7-4bce-9d60-3f1d2a7fb3f4
- Page table entry (PTE): hold the physical translation plus any other useful stuff like valid bit, protection bits, present bit, dirty bit, accessed bit
hl-page:: 215
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430c665-8485-46e6-810a-b2d62b01cf66
hl-color:: yellow
- Linear Page Table: just an Array. The OS indexes the array by the VPN, and looks up the PTE at that index in order to find the desired PFN.
hl-page:: 216
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430cb48-d435-4bb4-807e-402ee20d0a98
hl-color:: yellow
- Figure 18.6: Accessing Memory With Paging(Initial Version)
hl-page:: 219
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430cac6-63c8-4ab7-a402-49097ef24154
hl-color:: yellow
Extra memory references are costly
- beguile 哄骗(某人做某事);诱骗;吸引(某人);
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 215
hl-color:: green
id:: 6430c18b-cd3f-400d-8414-3b780ed1b4ce
- gruesome 可怕的;阴森的
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 216
hl-color:: green
id:: 6430c51c-591b-4739-921a-ea9e0abbfbaa
- judicious 审慎而明智的
hl-page:: 217
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430c5f3-3ce3-486d-b7ee-832673fa4d4d
hl-color:: green
- Translation-Lookaside Buffer(TLB)
hl-page:: 226
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430cc79-5b7c-4cc3-9d7e-39a44a333c77
hl-color:: yellow
- **a hardware cache** of popular virtual-to-physical address translations. Due to temporal and spatial locality, TLB works quite well.
- Figure 19.1: TLB Control Flow Algorithm: hit and miss
hl-page:: 227
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430ccdf-09c2-42e2-aa80-7859bb320b91
hl-color:: yellow
- TLB Miss handler
hl-page:: 231
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430d596-d805-4bc8-a3a7-219d6927a503
hl-color:: yellow
- hardware-managed TLBs: transparent to OS, if page table relative stuff is properly set.
hl-page:: 231
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430d5ac-5021-4b2e-a5d7-e3e4988a4a89
hl-color:: yellow
- software-managed TLB: hardware raises an exception and goes to a trap handler.
hl-page:: 231
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430d5be-7a59-4ef2-9ba3-94e8298f4e47
hl-color:: yellow
Then OS takes over, trap handler code looks up page table, and use privileged instructions to update TLB.
- Special trap: Syscall resumes to the next instruction(like a procedure call); TLB trap resumes to the instruction caused the trap(retry, this time should have a TLB hit).
- Infinite chain of TLB misses: what if the trap handler causes a TLB miss? Reserve some unmapped memory or some always-valid TLB entries to avoid such terrible situation.
id:: 6430d9b4-c202-486f-9943-bd5c6d1310a8
- Fully-associative TLB: `VPN | PFN | other bits`.
hl-page:: 233
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430db45-ace1-4bcf-9672-b929c8720bf2
hl-color:: yellow
- "Fully-associative" means no limit on the relation between VPN and PFN, and the hardware lookup can be performed in parallel.
- Other bits include some bits from PTE, and a valid bit indicating whether the *translation* is valid(not about the page), which has different meaning from the valid bit in PTE.
- TLB and Context Switch: page table is ((6430c091-bc57-4930-bac1-9e1762b7c3e1)).
Conflicts show up when the same VPN is mapped to different PFNs. This is quite common because all processes' have similar address space layout.
- Flush TLB on context switches by some kind of flush instruction(software TLB) or changing the PTBR(hardware TLB, e.g. x86's CR3). Simple but wasteful.
- Add an address space identifier(ASID) field to TLB entry, which identifies different processes and allows them to share TLB without flushing on context switch.
- Replacement Policy: Random, LRU
hl-page:: 236
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430e32c-f334-4274-a56f-03a793d05df9
hl-color:: yellow
- MIPS R4k TLB Entry Layout
- G-global bit, the entry is globally-shared among processes, thus shadowing the ASID field
- C-coherence bit, deals with process number that exceeds ASID capability
- D-dirty bit; V-valid bit
- Page mask, large page support
- CP0-wired register: tell the hardware how many slots of the TLB to reserve for the OS to solve this: ((6430d9b4-c202-486f-9943-bd5c6d1310a8))
- Problems
hl-page:: 238
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430e5e3-d80e-44f2-8cfc-7424b8a8ff92
hl-color:: yellow
- Exceeding the TLB coverage: too many pages are accessed in a short period of time. Maybe we need some large pages
- CPU pipeline bottleneck: physically-indexed cache requires address translation before cache lookup, causing high delay. Solutions like virtually-indexed cache, VIPT
- premise 前提;假定
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 228
hl-color:: green
id:: 6430d370-e99b-4443-bd55-3aa5b941b2c4
- sneaky 悄悄的;偷偷摸摸的;鬼鬼祟祟的
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 231
hl-color:: green
id:: 6430d54f-9837-4f82-b4b0-13ab387c9a7a
- TLB Size Measurement: loop through an large array and access the elements by page stride. Measure the time cost by repeating this for millions of time.
hl-page:: 240
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6430e720-f62a-4094-9ecf-3a6d47540d34
hl-color:: yellow
- page tables are too big and thus consume too much memory.
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 242
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 6431070d-a42a-4403-b6c5-bab956d5608f
- Bigger Pages
hl-page:: 242
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 643106f5-b280-4331-be8e-70f8c34c3c28
hl-color:: yellow
- Reduce page table size and TLB pressure, though internal fragmentation becomes the major problem.
- Suitable for professional software which frequently uses memory-consuming data structures like database.
- Hybrid approach: Segments with paging
hl-page:: 245
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64310894-f97b-4d29-b477-75d45b1af812
hl-color:: yellow
- Each segment, which is *bounded*, have a page table which stores a few pages that are in use. We don't need to cover the whole address space where many PTEs are just invalid.
- The original base register now points to the *physical address of the page table*; and the bounds register indicates the end of the page table for this segment.
- Virtual address is accordingly split into 3 parts `Segment | VPN | Offset`. And the lookup procedure also needs adaptation: `PTE_Addr = Base[SegNo] + (VPN * sizeof(PTE))`
- Problem: inflexible due to segmentation; external fragmentation because page tables are still variable-sized(though other part of memory is fixed-sized); complexity.
- multi-level page table
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 246
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 64310f59-4581-45b8-9b56-9e0ef04ec513
- turns the linear page table into something like a tree, the detailed working principles are quite easy thus ignored here, or look at the link below as a review
- Figure 20.6: Multi-level Page Table Control Flow
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 253
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 64318f9a-b732-4bab-9a1e-73519fac8059
- Page directory and Page Directory Entry(PDE)
- Advantages: Page table size is in proportion to address space usage; Easy to manage, contiguous physical memory is not required for page table(in contrast to Segment + Paging)
- Problems: Complexity; More penalty at TLB miss (need to access RAM more than once)
- inverted page table
hl-page:: 254
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64319047-2ffb-4355-9aab-82ea232375aa
hl-color:: yellow
- A system-wide single page table instead of per-process page table. Inverted page table has an entry for each physical page, which tells us which process is using this page, and which virtual page is mapped to this physical page.
- The translation process is to search this table by VA and PID to find the correct entry. Maybe build a hash table to speed up this search.
- Support large address spaces: stash away portions of address spaces that currently aren't in great demand.
hl-page:: 257
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 643196c4-91fa-43c2-832e-7080b0617fe5
hl-color:: yellow
- Swap space
hl-page:: 258
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64319715-78ae-4efe-bab1-def007ee8e78
hl-color:: yellow
- Reserve some space on disk for moving pages back and forth, and the OS needs to remember the *disk address* of a given page.
- swap space is not the only on-disk location for swapping, e.g. program binary loading, not necessarily load the whole code segment at first
hl-page:: 258
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64319809-1dbe-48dc-a4e4-7e14062d42c5
hl-color:: yellow
- Present bit and Page fault
hl-page:: 259
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 643221b9-c6ee-4cdd-bde9-6d31cd39f9f3
hl-color:: yellow
- PTE has a present bit which indicates whether the page is in memory. When accessing a page with present bit clear (of course, assume valid), hardware raises a page fault exception.
- One way to keep the *disk address* is to reuse the original PFN field(after all, when a page is on disk, PFN is invalid)
- while the I/O is in flight, the process will be in the blocked state
hl-page:: 261
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6432277e-131b-4651-a2e9-bd51e4e5b7e6
hl-color:: yellow
- Page-Fault Control Flow Algorithm (Software)
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 263
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 643229bd-fc80-45a7-a326-ddb73c8df04f
- What if the memory if full?
- *page out* one or more pages to make room for the new page(s)
- In practice, OS always wants to keep a small amount of memory free. Most OSs have some kind of high watermark (HW ) and low watermark (LW ) to help decide when to start evicting pages from memory.
hl-page:: 263
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64322a2c-91e1-47b7-8c3a-174d1c718b9f
hl-color:: yellow
- When the OS notices that there are fewer than LW pages available, a background thread that is responsible for freeing memory runs.
hl-page:: 263
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64322b0d-6e56-44aa-a5ec-a23e43355053
hl-color:: yellow
The thread evicts pages until there are HW pages available.
The background thread then goes to sleep.
- Possible optimization: cluster or group a number of pages and write them out at once for better disk efficiency
- proactive 积极主动的;主动出击的;先发制人的
hl-page:: 263
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6432298b-31e8-419e-b84d-3ecf08616a25
hl-color:: green
- Replacement Policy
hl-page:: 268
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64324655-73cb-40a7-814b-1dd26b310e41
hl-color:: yellow
- cache: RAM can be regarded as the *cache* for all the pages in the system. And the goal of our replacement policy is to minimize cache misses.
hl-page:: 268
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6432466b-0d2b-4dac-990f-168a82743a94
hl-color:: yellow
- Average Memory Access Time (AMAT): $AMAT = T_M + P_{Miss} \cdot T_D$, where $T_M$ is the cost of memory access and $T_D$ is the cost of disk access. The cost of disk access is so high that *miss rate* is crucial to the overall AMAT.
hl-page:: 268
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6432471f-f8f1-4a2c-aa82-abd0ec24142e
hl-color:: yellow
- Optimal Replacement Policy
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 269
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 643248c0-69b7-4b23-a8be-94df2abb38e6
- Replace the page that will *be accessed furthest in the future*.
- The reason this is true is simple: you will refer to the other pages before you refer to the one furthest out.
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 270
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 64324c4e-165b-4ba4-838a-afc002decd34
- FIFO: evict the earliest page, cannot determine the importance of blocks
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 271
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 64325410-09a2-472f-b67b-426df53d4c81
- Random: randomly choose one page to evict, depend on the luck
hl-page:: 273
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64325422-d727-4104-9c85-6c18260a1b6e
hl-color:: yellow
- LRU
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 274
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 643256d9-6c65-4e29-adab-f5a6d112bccd
- Historical information: frequency and recency of access. Thus there is Least-Frequently-Used (LFU) policy and Least-Recently-Used (LRU) policy
- LRU Implement
hl-page:: 278
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64325b27-c557-40ad-86ff-e46eb11dbf77
hl-color:: yellow
- Precise LRU: On every memory reference, some data structure need to be updated to maintain the LRU property, which is slow even with some hardware support.
- Approximating LRU:
- Hardware support: *use bit* in PTE. Whenever a page is referenced, the *use bit* is set to 1 and the hardware never clears it.
- clock algorithm: All pages are stored in a circular structure, and a *clock hand* points to one of the pages. On eviction demand, check the *used bit* of the current page. If set, clear it and go to the next page, until a page with *used bit* is 0 (it guarantees to converge, the worst case is to search through all pages and clear them all).
hl-page:: 279
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6432650c-142d-46ba-a8b1-4f0c1af50635
hl-color:: yellow
- Indeed, any approach which periodically clears the *use bits* and then differentiates between which pages have *use bits* of 1 versus 0 to decide which to replace would be fine
hl-page:: 279
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64326b23-8bc8-4b41-96ac-d4044db00dbd
hl-color:: yellow
- Workload Examples
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 275
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 643258e8-576b-4e22-91da-8579517b82bc
- **No-locality workload**: each reference is to a random page within the set of accessed pages. Optimal do better, and the others are almost the same.
- **80-20 workload**: 80% of the references are made to 20% of the pages.
- **Looping-sequential workload**: worst case for FIFO and LRU, because they keep evicting older pages which will be accessed sooner than cached pages.
Random does better, one of its nice properties is not having weird corner-case behaviors.
*scan resistance* is added to LRU to try to avoid this worst case for LRU.
- **Dirty Bit**: Dirty pages may be more costly to evict, because they need to be written to disk instead of simply discarded. Therefore, some systems prefer to evict clean pages over dirty pages.
- **thrashing**
hl-page:: 281
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64339732-f900-4f7b-8783-782c8cb73550
hl-color:: yellow
- The system will constantly be paging, when the running process requires more memory than the available physical memory.
- **admission control**: not to run some subset of the processes when they require too much memory
hl-page:: 281
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 643398d2-0574-49f6-9873-c3b725d3649f
hl-color:: yellow
- TYPES OF CACHE MISSES:
hl-page:: 271
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64324c6c-2057-46b3-aa2f-fa1e0748e1e8
hl-color:: yellow
- compulsory miss: cold-start miss
- capacity miss
- conflict miss: set-associativity, limits on where an item can be placed
- anomaly 异常事物;反常现象
hl-page:: 272
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6432503c-9c30-4ae0-8aa0-e867554b1662
hl-color:: green
- discrepancy 差异;不符合;不一致
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 282
hl-color:: green
id:: 64339651-5357-49a3-b495-6f1db7826dcc
- prohibitive 费用或价格)高得令人望而却步的;限制性的,禁止的;
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 282
hl-color:: green
id:: 64339660-fb5e-46f9-94a1-bd70bc684fc5
- thrash 翻来覆去;抽打;一举战胜 (不是 trash 垃圾)
hl-page:: 281
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 64339700-b057-4150-bc27-1a3ee4cb536d
hl-color:: green
- VAX/VMS Virtual Memory
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 286
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 64339ec6-877f-42eb-ba92-4211f543c0f3
- Memory Management Hardware
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 286
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 64339efd-a5cd-487b-9eb8-caf7e824de7a
- 32 bit VA and 512B page -> 2 bit segment, 21 bit VPN, 9 bit offset
- 4 segments: P0, P1, S0, S1
- Process Space: lower half of the AS, unique for each process. Divided into `P0` and `P1`, `P0` includes Code and Heap, while `P1` is Stack.
- System Space: upper half of AS, though only half of this is used by the VMS OS.
- Problem: 512-Byte page is so small that page table could occupy too much memory.
- Per-segment page table, VAX-11 provides each segment with a pair of base-and-bounds register
- The page tables are allocated in OS memory(System Space), though this complicates the translation process.
- The VAX/VMS Address Space
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 288
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 6433a3cc-c528-4c8d-bca2-9bdab780e27a
- Invalid Page 0: help debug null-pointers
- base and bounds registers for S0 (OS) stay the same and the kernel is mapped into each process's AS
- Page Replacement
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 289
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 6433a4e2-191f-4c49-8c5f-e9a78cb4c476
- No reference bit: VAX-11 doesn't have this. Fortunately, just what we does in COW, this can be emulated by page fault.
- Memory hogging: LRU is not a fair share policy.
- Segmented FIFO:
- Resident Set Size(RSS): each process has a maximum number of pages it can keep in memory
- FIFO list: when a process exceeds its RSS, the first page is evicted
- Second-chance lists: a *global* clean-page list and a *global* dirty-page list. When evicted, page is removed from per-process FIFO and added to these 2 lists. If another process needs a free page, give a clean page from this list. Or, if the original process raises a page fault, it reclaims a page.
- **clustering**: VMS groups large batches of pages together from the global dirty list, and writes them to disk in one fell swoop.
hl-page:: 290
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6433a931-90cf-4e1f-8ea7-922bc81f354e
hl-color:: yellow
- Lazy optimizations: use protection and trap to save some laborious work
hl-page:: 291
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6433a9cd-4ecd-4a8e-b778-8c0c36af929a
hl-color:: yellow
- **demand zeroing**: The OS is responsible to zero a page when allocating it to a process for security and isolation. This can be deferred to when the process actually uses this page in case the process never uses it.
hl-page:: 291
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6433aa48-cb30-4a01-9670-64ac357bc2ab
hl-color:: yellow
- **copy-on-write**: When the OS needs to copy a page from one address space to another, instead of copying it, it can map it into the target address space and mark it read-only in both address spaces.
hl-page:: 291
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6433aa4c-e737-43aa-bcc9-34609d86fe42
hl-color:: yellow
- circumvent 规避;设法回避;绕过;绕行
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 287
hl-color:: green
id:: 6433a0cd-3e8b-4c0c-af4e-8cbf498b9231
- astute 精明的;狡猾的
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 289
hl-color:: green
id:: 6433a2a0-7ba4-46cf-b1ec-fc02ce4c7916
- hog 多占;独占;(供食用的)猪
hl-page:: 289
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6433a4fb-da6c-4741-a962-6c95c7fd9f0c
hl-color:: green
- swoop 俯冲;突然袭击;突击搜查;突然行动
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 291
hl-color:: green
id:: 6433a96f-0414-4ec5-963b-72161ce23ef0
- The Linux Virtual Memory System
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 292
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 6433abf7-a59b-42ae-af0b-05706abee681
- The Linux Address Space
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 293
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 6433ac19-794e-4bcb-abf9-d406d1a148d3
- **kernel logical addresses**
- allocated by `kmalloc`
- most kernel data structures live here like page tables and per-process kernel stacks
- cannot be swapped to disk
- linear mapped to physical memory, `PA = VA - 0xC000_0000`, which simplifies translation and its *contiguity* for DMA
- kernel virtual address
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 294
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 6433b05c-6a5a-4ae5-8664-03fa83483598
- allocated by `vmalloc`
- no physical contiguity guarantee
- easier to map and able to allocate larger size
- Page Table
- 64-bit page table structure: 48 bit VA, including 36 bit 4 level VPN and 12 bit offset for 4KB page size
- Large Page Support
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 295
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 6433b26b-111b-4fa3-930b-232d23287999
- Intel x86 allows for use of multiple page sizes
- Advantages: less memory consumption from page table, fewer TLB miss, shorter TLB miss path
- Disadvantages: internal fragmentation, more cost in swapping
- Explicit interface: applications explicitly request memory allocated with large pages through calls like `mmap` or `shmget`
- Transparent huge page support: When this feature is enabled, the operating system automatically looks for opportunities to allocate huge pages without requiring application modification.
- The Page Cache
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 297
hl-color:: yellow
id:: 6433b63d-6815-4c33-a5fb-c7c20c06fcab
- To reduce costs of accessing persistent storage
- unified, keeping pages in memory from 3 primary sources: 1. memory-mapped files; 2. file data and metadata from devices; 3. heap and stack pages that comprise each process.
hl-page:: 297
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6433b736-af15-4e56-b2ba-3bec294483ce
hl-color:: yellow
- Dirty data is periodically written to the backing store by background threads
- 2Q replacement algorithm
hl-page:: 297
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6433b6dc-b1d4-4c88-bd92-8c9359bece02
hl-color:: yellow
- Solved problem: cyclic access to a large file will kick out other pages
- Divide the pages into 2 lists: *inactive* list and *active* list
- accessed for the first time, a page is placed on the *inactive* list
re-referenced, the page is promoted to the *active* list
periodically move bottom of the *active* list to *inactive* list
within the 2 lists, manage pages in LRU order
- When replacing, the candidate is taken from the *inactive* list.
- tract 束;地带;小册子;大片土地
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 295
hl-color:: green
id:: 6433b29c-817e-44f0-a02e-8ab14f6fe764
- yell 大喊;喊叫;叫嚷;
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 296
hl-color:: green
id:: 6433b321-04d6-4118-9d04-80758598654e
- scorn 轻蔑;不屑一顾;
hl-page:: 296
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6433b345-d17f-48ea-b0d4-ec3eba091be4
hl-color:: green
- subvert 颠覆;暗中破坏;使背叛;
hl-page:: 297
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6433b6c0-0673-41c5-93a5-8280f5a6ab4b
hl-color:: green
- speculative 推测的;投机的;
hl-page:: 301
ls-type:: annotation
id:: 6433b625-8749-4211-8d7a-3770dcd86ec2
hl-color:: green
- multitude 众多;群众;人群;大量
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 302
hl-color:: green
id:: 6433b5fa-2c4f-434c-9ab8-5142eb2cec45
- shudder 战栗;强烈的震动;
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 305
hl-color:: green
id:: 6433bb38-56f9-47b1-b4d1-617c8693eb50
- cheapskate 小气鬼;守财奴
ls-type:: annotation
hl-page:: 306
hl-color:: green
id:: 6433bce5-e05b-4fd3-8af1-30bdd091ab00